{"id":202,"date":"2014-11-15T15:13:13","date_gmt":"2014-11-15T20:13:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kendoc911.wordpress.com\/?page_id=202"},"modified":"2014-11-15T15:13:13","modified_gmt":"2014-11-15T20:13:13","slug":"911-experiments","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/911warroom.com\/kendoc\/911-experiments\/","title":{"rendered":"9\/11 EXPERIMENTS"},"content":{"rendered":"

9\/11 EXPERIMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

Listed throughout this page are many logical experiments that prove the official story of the three collapses is fiction.<\/p>\n

On 9\/11 we were told that the block on the left fell through the path of greatest resistance at nearly the same rate it would have taken to fall through air. Not only is this physically impossible but it also violates Newtons laws of motion.<\/p>\n

\"physicsquiznew\"<\/a><\/p>\n

It\u2019s physically impossible for the top 1\/5th of a building to smash through and completely destroy the entire bottom 4\/5ths. If it disagrees with experiment….. it’s wrong!<\/p>\n

\"physicsmeme5\"<\/a><\/p>\n

It doesn’t matter what material you use, take a tower of any material and slice it across at three quarters of the way up and try dropping it on the lower piece. In no experiment will it ever destroy the whole bottom piece. It doesn\u2019t matter if you use bricks, ice, mortar, plastic, egg crates, cardboard or even 90 floors of untouched steel and concrete. Cannot and will never happen!<\/p>\n

Not a single person in the World can replicate through experiment what we witnessed for both Towers on 9\/11. Not NIST, NASA, POPULAR MECHANICS, or ANYONE for that matter.<\/p>\n

\"question15c\"<\/a>
\n————-
\nHere is an example that could easily prove or disprove the official reason for the Towers collapse. It would be this simple.<\/p>\n

\"replicaexperiment.jpg\"
\n————
\nNIST admits that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds for just over 100 feet. For this to happen all structural supports have to be eliminated at precisely the same time. Something that fire alone could never accomplish.<\/p>\n

\"download\"<\/a>
\n———–
\nJON COLE<\/strong><\/p>\n

9\/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s<\/p>\n

\"joncoleexperiment1\"<\/a>
\n————
\n9\/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 1 of 2
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=ww8hBFNY8jk
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=dgZLXI3whGA<\/p>\n

\"newtonsthirdlaw\"<\/a>
\n————
\n9\/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w
\n————
\n9\/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM
\n————-
\n9\/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=TJNzaMRsN00&
\n————
\nNEWTON’S LAWS VS. NIST – 9\/11 EXPERIMENTS
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=-5oQ2mTwa9s
\n———-
\nNIST WTC-report. What a laugh
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=-RzwmD8uB8g
\n———–<\/p>\n

RICHARD GAGE<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have all seen Richard Gage do this experiment with Cardboard boxes. Many people knock him for it but I praise him for trying to explain it to the American idiots that just don’t get it.<\/p>\n

\"gagecardboard\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Hardfire trailer ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9\/11 TRUTH
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=hFVi4qbN2jM<\/p>\n

\"cardboardgagememe\"<\/a><\/p>\n

(Here is the same video of debunkers mocking Richard)
\nAE911TRUTH PLAYSCHOOL WITH RICHARD GAGE.
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw
\n—————-<\/p>\n

RODGER HERBST<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Any chain reaction theory would have to accommodate the fact that each of the towers unraveled completely in less than 15 seconds, which is close to the time of free fall from the top of the buildings if there had been no intervening solid structure. How could a mechanical process proceed through 100 floors with such speed?” – Rodger Herbst – Bachelor of aeronautical and astronautical engineering and mechanical engineer.<\/p>\n

WTC 1 Weight total = approx. 551,156 tons
\nWTC 1 Floor weight = approx. 5,010 tons
\nWTC 1 Twelve floor section weight = approx. 60,120 tons
\nWTC 1 Remaining Intact Structure Weight = approx. 490,980 tons<\/p>\n

551156\/60120 = 9.16<\/p>\n

Estimated Ratio Of 12 floor section to remaining structure = 1\/9<\/p>\n

Therefore, the uppermost twelve floor section which fell onto the remaining 98 floors
\nrepresented just over 1\/9 of the remaining intact structure below it. 60,120 tons fell onto 490,980 tons and effected total catastrophic collapse there-of.<\/p>\n

**** Let’s not forget; These numbers are estimates. There exists several estimated total weights for the towers across several reports \/ agencies. However, ratios do not change regardless of the mass.”
\nhttp:\/\/septembereleventh.org\/documents\/rodgwtcpdf.pdf
\n——————<\/p>\n

OTHER EXPERIMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

9\/11 Experiment: Egg Drop, Equal Collision disproves Bazant’s “Pile Driver” Theory
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=g6H0hu3tTig
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=9bUNNoRQack
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=f2KkGchyLTg<\/p>\n


\n———-
\nSNOW TOWERS!
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=RrSAn1V7bec
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=9jbVGzzsn9U<\/p>\n

\"snowtowers\"<\/a>
\n————-
\n9\/11 Physics: “You Can’t Use Common Sense”
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=KDHN1gBkx0M<\/p>\n

\"trickedoutbug\"<\/a>
\n—————–
\nThe 9\/11 Experiment That Even WOKE UP Forrest Gump!
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=99ZVdBMtBe0&
\n————————<\/p>\n

9\/11 JENGA\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"911jengameme\"<\/a>
\nJenga Pistol
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=F9BmTmMEOhQ<\/p>\n

\"jengagun\"<\/a><\/p>\n

9\/11 Jenga (LOL)
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=9My8sbckwAc
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=s7MVAKlLFaM<\/p>\n

\"jengasawdust\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Playing With Fire: Flaming Giant Jenga
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=YfumLZLmonI<\/p>\n

\"jengafire\"<\/p>\n

————<\/p>\n

KING OF THE NERDS<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nerd wins challenge with 9\/11 Truth physics (Experiment starts at 8 minutes)
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=OjvCNDF4RYw
\nwww.dailymotion.com\/video\/x2draq1_nerd-wins-challenge-with-9-11-truth-physics<\/p>\n

King of the Nerds – Enginerds Season 1 Episode 7
\n\"nerdtestbowling\"<\/a><\/p>\n

9\/11 Reference at 4:50 and the Experiment\/Challenge starts at 8 Minutes.<\/p>\n

\"kingofthenerdsdanielle911\"<\/p>\n

“TBS reality show called King of the Nerds Episode 7, saw a challenge where the nerds had to guess the results of dropped weights onto layers of glass, having to guess how many glass sheets would be shattered.<\/p>\n

Danielle a nerd girl gamer (sporting cotton candy pink hair), researched a number of 9\/11 Physics sites to win the challenge beating 4 other nerds including a girl called \u201cMoogega\u201d who works as a Nasa Engineer!<\/p>\n

Danielle thanks 9\/11 conspiracy theorists for her win, thus proving on national TV the credibility of the 9\/11 movement.”<\/p>\n

(Experiment starts at 8 mins in)<\/p>\n

Test A:
\nBall weight: 6 pounds
\nBall diameter: 6 inches
\nGlass thickness: 1\/8 inch
\nGlass weight, one sheet: 6 pounds
\n26 sheets of glass, spaced 3 inches apart
\nFirst sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball<\/p>\n

Test B:
\nBall weight: 8 pounds
\nBall diameter: 6.75 inches
\nGlass thickness: \u00bc inch
\nGlass weight, one sheet: 11 pounds, 8 ounces
\n13 sheets of glass, spaced 6 inches apart
\nFirst sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball<\/p>\n

Test C:
\nPig weight: 15 pounds (this is a plush pig)
\nGlass thickness: \u00bc inch
\nGlass weight, one sheet: 11 pounds, 8 ounces
\n26 sheets of glass, spaced 3 inches apart
\nFirst sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball
\nhttp:\/\/www.examiner.com\/article\/king-of-the-nerds-episode-7-enginerds
\n———————-
\nPink-haired ‘nerd’ scores win, thanks to 9\/11 Truth websites
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/en\/news-section\/57-news-releases-by-others\/931-pink-haired-nerd-scores-win-thanks-to-911-truth-websites.html<\/p>\n

“But the main sources of Danielle’s research were 9\/11 Truth websites. “The only thing I’ve found that’s even similar to what we’re doing are people who are trying to disprove 9\/11 being a terrorist attack,” she observed. “I have literally found probably ten websites using an example of dropping a bowling ball through panes of glass to explain why the Twin Towers is a conspiracy.”
\n———————-<\/p>\n

1,000,000 EUROS CHALLENGE<\/strong><\/p>\n

This engineer is offering \u20ac1,000,000 Euros to anyone that can pass this challenge!
\nhttp:\/\/heiwaco.tripod.com\/chall.htm<\/p>\n

“You are requested to describe a structure where a small top part C can crush the much bigger bottom part A from above, when top part C is dropped by gravity on bottom part A.” Anders Bj\u00f6rkman<\/p>\n

\"GM5\"<\/a>
\n————-<\/p>\n

OTHER<\/strong><\/p>\n

Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c<\/p>\n

\"911experiment\"<\/a>
\n——-
\n(Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=ecmQegzMJQE
\n——–
\nModel Replica of the WTC on 9\/11 – Part 1 of 2
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=aw4GW977OmI&<\/p>\n

Part 2
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=HkeG_tnAh_I
\n——-
\n9\/11 Challenge (Hand Clap)
\nwww.dailymotion.com\/video\/x48ywb_9-11-challenge_news<\/p>\n

Can you clap your hands 10 times in 1 second? It would be the same as taking out 10 floors every second (110 Floors in 11 seconds). This is essentially the same rate of free fall. As if there was no resistance at all. Let that sink in.<\/p>\n

\"claphands911meme\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"handclapmeme\"
\n——-
\n9\/11 Experiment: Steel Pan Upon Fire
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=bkhE_BMJuc8
\n——-
\n9\/11 Experiments: Does steel weaken much under fire?
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=0WLitXT4yHQ<\/p>\n

\"fireexperimentsteel\"
\n———-
\n9\/11 Simple Experiment (Not very well done)
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=OjKjHEAJ5u4
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=lBuH8NNIBys
\n———
\nWhich one will reach the ground first?
\nwww.facebook.com\/physicsisawesome\/photos\/a.533755626685715.1073741824.166136336780981\/710335195694423\/
\n———————
\n9\/11 Physics 101; Air, Water, or WTC Steel? You decide.
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=SlBjAZ4EFR0&<\/p>\n

\"GM1\"<\/a>
\n————-<\/p>\n

EXPERIMENTS TO TRY ON YOUR OWN<\/strong><\/p>\n

Experiment: Grab 4 cinder blocks, stack em on each other. Grab the the top block, raise it above the 3rd block and let go. Tell me what happens?<\/p>\n

Chances are it will come to a rest on the third block, it may simply tip over, or it might break off into chunks of concrete. What it will NOT do is completely pulverize all three blocks below (including itself) into dust.<\/p>\n

\"cinderblock\"<\/a>
\n————
\nExperiment: I have been doing this experiment each summer and it’s very easy to do. You know those Sparklers for kids. Well, when they are finished, I end up putting them in my camp fire and guess what? They don’t melt. Not after one hour, not after 8 hours, not after 15 different fires. They will not melt in your fire pit.<\/p>\n

I end up taking them out when cleaning my pit with a shovel and then I try again with new ones. They never melt.<\/p>\n

\"sparklers1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

www.youtube.com\/watch?v=0eQEHx0yPIU
\n————
\nExperiment: Have you ever stood on a popcan? I think we have all tried it at one point in time. An empty hollow aluminum popcan typically weighs 15 grams, yet it can easily hold the weight of 100 lbs.<\/p>\n

In comparison, 100 lbs is roughly 45,000 grams. Which means a hollow aluminum popcan can hold over 300,000% of it’s weight. Think about it for a second.<\/p>\n

Standing on a soda can
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=HJ2A7g2tZ3c<\/p>\n

\"popcanstand\"<\/a>
\n————-
\nExperiment:\u00a0Why is it that our cooking pots, frying pans and Barbeque hot plates which are made out of steel, do not melt or even sag due to direct exposure to gas flames or air fires? Try it! See if you can melt your steel pot from a jet-fuel air fire!<\/p>\n


\n—————-<\/p>\n

OTHER SCENARIOS<\/strong><\/p>\n

1) If kerosene (jet fuel) burning in air can really cause the complete destruction of a steel framed tower, then why do controlled demolition experts spend weeks to carefully prepare high-rise buildings with explosive charges when they can just use a few hundred liters of kerosene?<\/p>\n

\"kersosenefire\"<\/a><\/p>\n

2) Why do foundry men and materials engineers have to use expensive induction furnaces, blast furnaces or arc furnaces to melt steel, if they can melt steel with some kerosene (jet fuel) which is much cheaper?<\/p>\n

\"blastfurnace\"<\/a><\/p>\n

3) Why is it that engineers design motorcycle and car engine pistons and cylinders using iron and alloy steel, if these components are constantly exposed to FIRE AND COMBUSTIONS?<\/p>\n

\"carpistons\"<\/a><\/p>\n

4) Try to get powdered concrete just by burning it with jet fuel fire and dropping it from\u00a0the height of a floor.<\/p>\n

www.youtube.com\/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k<\/p>\n

9\/11 Experiment: Concrete evidence. Does it pulverize when falling?
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k<\/p>\n

Full version
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=AwPbz1eH2DA<\/p>\n

The LINE-X Cement Brick Drop – How Tough is LINE-X?
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=PuUsHxlf8vE
\n———<\/p>\n

FAILED EXPERIMENTS<\/strong><\/p>\n

9\/11 wasn’t an inside job
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=tS5T_i1N6J8<\/p>\n

\"kidfailexperiment\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The kids own experiment didn’t work the way he wanted it to…. so he just destroys it with his hands. @1:25. lol
\n———
\nCharlie Veitch “changing his opinion” about 9\/11
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=V4i8nBUc2T0<\/p>\n

LEGO TOWERS!<\/p>\n

\"legomeme\"<\/a>
\n———
\nThe kid pushes the top of the lego tower all the way down adding an external secondary force. 9\/11 Experiment FAIL! He even cleaned out his vacuum cleaner for dust. lol<\/p>\n

\"kidfailexperiment1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Lego – WTC Pancake Collapse
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=e7qQWdUPKAo
\n——-
\njet fuel could melt steal beams IF IT’S ON FIRE
\nwww.youtube.com\/watch?v=Kp9_rORKzUg<\/p>\n

\"experimentfail5\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Fails experiment because the bottom block suffered structural damage from dozens of paper plane impacts.
\n——————<\/p>\n