{"id":2696,"date":"2015-01-21T02:16:09","date_gmt":"2015-01-21T07:16:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kendoc911.wordpress.com\/?page_id=2696"},"modified":"2015-01-21T02:16:09","modified_gmt":"2015-01-21T07:16:09","slug":"debunking-nist","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/911warroom.com\/kendoc\/nist\/debunking-nist\/","title":{"rendered":"DEBUNKING NIST"},"content":{"rendered":"

DEBUNKING NIST<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reading through NIST’s papers, watching their simulations, and studying their own research…… NIST practically debunk themselves. Here are well sourced links from professionals that have debunked NIST and have proven beyond doubt that NIST’s findings were unscientific and fraudulent.
\n———–<\/p>\n

AE911TRUTH<\/strong><\/p>\n

NIST’s WTC 7 Reports: Filled with Fantasy, Fiction, and Fraud<\/p>\n

INTRODUCTION
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/186-news-media-events-1-of-6-nist-fraud.html<\/p>\n

“NIST has made many false written and oral statements about the collapses of the three World Trade Center buildings on 9\/11 \u2014 statements that have now caused 2,300 architects and engineers to question the government investigator’s credibility and veracity. One of its most implausible claims is that a high-rise steel structure in New York City was destroyed by fire alone.”
\n—–
\nPART 1: NIST andPopular Mechanics Fabricate Myth About WTC 7’s “Scooped-Out” 10 Stories
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/190-news-media-events-2-of-6-nist-fraud.html
\n—–
\nPART 2: NIST’s Fictitious Gouge Launches Design Flaw Myth and Collapse Initiation Theory
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/197-news-media-events-3-of-6-nist-fraud-3.html
\n—–
\nPART 3: Trusses & Tanks\u2014Popular Mechanics Helps NIST Create More Myths
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/206-news-media-events-4-of-6-nist-fraud-4.html
\n—–
\nPART 4: Independent Analysis Disproves NIST’s New Thermal Expansion Hypothesis.
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/215-news-media-events-5-of-6-nist-fraud-5.html
\n—–
\nPART 5: How Skyscrapers Are Really Imploded
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/news\/217-news-media-events-6-of-6-nist-fraud-6.html<\/p>\n

“…all in all, the official version of the failure of WTC 7 does not stand up to even the most elementary scrutiny. Yet with breathtaking chutzpah, NIST and the defenders of its theory continue to ask us all, paraphrasing a Chico Marx line in the movie Duck Soup, “Who are you going to believe, me or your own lying eyes?”
\n—–
\n25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
\nhttp:\/\/www1.ae911truth.org\/en\/news-section\/41-articles\/926-25-points-of-specific-concern-in-the-nist-wtc-reports.html<\/p>\n

“In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled \u201cAreas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports.\u201d Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent.”
\n———–
\nHow NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel
\nhttp:\/\/www.ae911truth.org\/documents\/How_NIST_Avoided_a_Real_Analysis_of_the_Physical_Evidence_of_WTC_Steel.pdf
\n———–
\nNIST ERRORS<\/p>\n

NIST Errors.com<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n