9/11 EXPERIMENTS

9/11 EXPERIMENTS

Listed throughout this page are many logical experiments that prove the official story of the three collapses is fiction.

On 9/11 we were told that the block on the left fell through the path of greatest resistance at nearly the same rate it would have taken to fall through air. Not only is this physically impossible but it also violates Newtons laws of motion.

It’s physically impossible for the top 1/5th of a building to smash through and completely destroy the entire bottom 4/5ths. If it disagrees with experiment….. it’s wrong!

It doesn’t matter what material you use, take a tower of any material and slice it across at three quarters of the way up and try dropping it on the lower piece. In no experiment will it ever destroy the whole bottom piece. It doesn’t matter if you use bricks, ice, mortar, plastic, egg crates, cardboard or even 90 floors of untouched steel and concrete. Cannot and will never happen!

Not a single person in the World can replicate through experiment what we witnessed for both Towers on 9/11. Not NIST, NASA, POPULAR MECHANICS, or ANYONE for that matter.

————-
Here is an example that could easily prove or disprove the official reason for the Towers collapse. It would be this simple.

————
NIST admits that WTC 7 fell at free fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds for just over 100 feet. For this to happen all structural supports have to be eliminated at precisely the same time. Something that fire alone could never accomplish.

———–
JON COLE

9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

————
9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 1 of 2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww8hBFNY8jk
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgZLXI3whGA

————
9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w
————
9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM
————-
9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNzaMRsN00&
————
NEWTON’S LAWS VS. NIST – 9/11 EXPERIMENTS
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5oQ2mTwa9s
———-
NIST WTC-report. What a laugh
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RzwmD8uB8g
———–

RICHARD GAGE

We have all seen Richard Gage do this experiment with Cardboard boxes. Many people knock him for it but I praise him for trying to explain it to the American idiots that just don’t get it.

Hardfire trailer ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFVi4qbN2jM

(Here is the same video of debunkers mocking Richard)
AE911TRUTH PLAYSCHOOL WITH RICHARD GAGE.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw
—————-

RODGER HERBST

“Any chain reaction theory would have to accommodate the fact that each of the towers unraveled completely in less than 15 seconds, which is close to the time of free fall from the top of the buildings if there had been no intervening solid structure. How could a mechanical process proceed through 100 floors with such speed?” – Rodger Herbst – Bachelor of aeronautical and astronautical engineering and mechanical engineer.

WTC 1 Weight total = approx. 551,156 tons
WTC 1 Floor weight = approx. 5,010 tons
WTC 1 Twelve floor section weight = approx. 60,120 tons
WTC 1 Remaining Intact Structure Weight = approx. 490,980 tons

551156/60120 = 9.16

Estimated Ratio Of 12 floor section to remaining structure = 1/9

Therefore, the uppermost twelve floor section which fell onto the remaining 98 floors
represented just over 1/9 of the remaining intact structure below it. 60,120 tons fell onto 490,980 tons and effected total catastrophic collapse there-of.

**** Let’s not forget; These numbers are estimates. There exists several estimated total weights for the towers across several reports / agencies. However, ratios do not change regardless of the mass.”
http://septembereleventh.org/documents/rodgwtcpdf.pdf
——————

OTHER EXPERIMENTS

9/11 Experiment: Egg Drop, Equal Collision disproves Bazant’s “Pile Driver” Theory
www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6H0hu3tTig
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bUNNoRQack
www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2KkGchyLTg

———-
SNOW TOWERS!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrSAn1V7bec
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jbVGzzsn9U

————-
9/11 Physics: “You Can’t Use Common Sense”
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDHN1gBkx0M

—————–
The 9/11 Experiment That Even WOKE UP Forrest Gump!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=99ZVdBMtBe0&
————————

9/11 JENGA 

Jenga Pistol
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9BmTmMEOhQ

9/11 Jenga (LOL)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9My8sbckwAc
www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7MVAKlLFaM

Playing With Fire: Flaming Giant Jenga
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfumLZLmonI

————

KING OF THE NERDS

Nerd wins challenge with 9/11 Truth physics (Experiment starts at 8 minutes)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjvCNDF4RYw
www.dailymotion.com/video/x2draq1_nerd-wins-challenge-with-9-11-truth-physics

King of the Nerds – Enginerds Season 1 Episode 7

9/11 Reference at 4:50 and the Experiment/Challenge starts at 8 Minutes.

“TBS reality show called King of the Nerds Episode 7, saw a challenge where the nerds had to guess the results of dropped weights onto layers of glass, having to guess how many glass sheets would be shattered.

Danielle a nerd girl gamer (sporting cotton candy pink hair), researched a number of 9/11 Physics sites to win the challenge beating 4 other nerds including a girl called “Moogega” who works as a Nasa Engineer!

Danielle thanks 9/11 conspiracy theorists for her win, thus proving on national TV the credibility of the 9/11 movement.”

(Experiment starts at 8 mins in)

Test A:
Ball weight: 6 pounds
Ball diameter: 6 inches
Glass thickness: 1/8 inch
Glass weight, one sheet: 6 pounds
26 sheets of glass, spaced 3 inches apart
First sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball

Test B:
Ball weight: 8 pounds
Ball diameter: 6.75 inches
Glass thickness: ¼ inch
Glass weight, one sheet: 11 pounds, 8 ounces
13 sheets of glass, spaced 6 inches apart
First sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball

Test C:
Pig weight: 15 pounds (this is a plush pig)
Glass thickness: ¼ inch
Glass weight, one sheet: 11 pounds, 8 ounces
26 sheets of glass, spaced 3 inches apart
First sheet 76 inches from bottom of ball
http://www.examiner.com/article/king-of-the-nerds-episode-7-enginerds
———————-
Pink-haired ‘nerd’ scores win, thanks to 9/11 Truth websites
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/57-news-releases-by-others/931-pink-haired-nerd-scores-win-thanks-to-911-truth-websites.html

“But the main sources of Danielle’s research were 9/11 Truth websites. “The only thing I’ve found that’s even similar to what we’re doing are people who are trying to disprove 9/11 being a terrorist attack,” she observed. “I have literally found probably ten websites using an example of dropping a bowling ball through panes of glass to explain why the Twin Towers is a conspiracy.”
———————-

1,000,000 EUROS CHALLENGE

This engineer is offering €1,000,000 Euros to anyone that can pass this challenge!
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/chall.htm

“You are requested to describe a structure where a small top part C can crush the much bigger bottom part A from above, when top part C is dropped by gravity on bottom part A.” Anders Björkman

————-

OTHER

Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports
www.youtube.com/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c

——-
(Part1) 911 Simple Physics Structural Failure Vs Demolition
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QMSAsOkumI
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecmQegzMJQE
——–
Model Replica of the WTC on 9/11 – Part 1 of 2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw4GW977OmI&

Part 2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkeG_tnAh_I
——-
9/11 Challenge (Hand Clap)
www.dailymotion.com/video/x48ywb_9-11-challenge_news

Can you clap your hands 10 times in 1 second? It would be the same as taking out 10 floors every second (110 Floors in 11 seconds). This is essentially the same rate of free fall. As if there was no resistance at all. Let that sink in.

——-
9/11 Experiment: Steel Pan Upon Fire
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkhE_BMJuc8
——-
9/11 Experiments: Does steel weaken much under fire?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WLitXT4yHQ

———-
9/11 Simple Experiment (Not very well done)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKjHEAJ5u4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBuH8NNIBys
———
Which one will reach the ground first?
www.facebook.com/physicsisawesome/photos/a.533755626685715.1073741824.166136336780981/710335195694423/
———————
9/11 Physics 101; Air, Water, or WTC Steel? You decide.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlBjAZ4EFR0&

————-

EXPERIMENTS TO TRY ON YOUR OWN

Experiment: Grab 4 cinder blocks, stack em on each other. Grab the the top block, raise it above the 3rd block and let go. Tell me what happens?

Chances are it will come to a rest on the third block, it may simply tip over, or it might break off into chunks of concrete. What it will NOT do is completely pulverize all three blocks below (including itself) into dust.

————
Experiment: I have been doing this experiment each summer and it’s very easy to do. You know those Sparklers for kids. Well, when they are finished, I end up putting them in my camp fire and guess what? They don’t melt. Not after one hour, not after 8 hours, not after 15 different fires. They will not melt in your fire pit.

I end up taking them out when cleaning my pit with a shovel and then I try again with new ones. They never melt.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eQEHx0yPIU
————
Experiment: Have you ever stood on a popcan? I think we have all tried it at one point in time. An empty hollow aluminum popcan typically weighs 15 grams, yet it can easily hold the weight of 100 lbs.

In comparison, 100 lbs is roughly 45,000 grams. Which means a hollow aluminum popcan can hold over 300,000% of it’s weight. Think about it for a second.

Standing on a soda can
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ2A7g2tZ3c

————-
Experiment: Why is it that our cooking pots, frying pans and Barbeque hot plates which are made out of steel, do not melt or even sag due to direct exposure to gas flames or air fires? Try it! See if you can melt your steel pot from a jet-fuel air fire!

—————-

OTHER SCENARIOS

1) If kerosene (jet fuel) burning in air can really cause the complete destruction of a steel framed tower, then why do controlled demolition experts spend weeks to carefully prepare high-rise buildings with explosive charges when they can just use a few hundred liters of kerosene?

2) Why do foundry men and materials engineers have to use expensive induction furnaces, blast furnaces or arc furnaces to melt steel, if they can melt steel with some kerosene (jet fuel) which is much cheaper?

3) Why is it that engineers design motorcycle and car engine pistons and cylinders using iron and alloy steel, if these components are constantly exposed to FIRE AND COMBUSTIONS?

4) Try to get powdered concrete just by burning it with jet fuel fire and dropping it from the height of a floor.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k

9/11 Experiment: Concrete evidence. Does it pulverize when falling?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k

Full version
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwPbz1eH2DA

The LINE-X Cement Brick Drop – How Tough is LINE-X?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuUsHxlf8vE
———

FAILED EXPERIMENTS

9/11 wasn’t an inside job
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS5T_i1N6J8

The kids own experiment didn’t work the way he wanted it to…. so he just destroys it with his hands. @1:25. lol
———
Charlie Veitch “changing his opinion” about 9/11
www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4i8nBUc2T0

LEGO TOWERS!

———
The kid pushes the top of the lego tower all the way down adding an external secondary force. 9/11 Experiment FAIL! He even cleaned out his vacuum cleaner for dust. lol

Lego – WTC Pancake Collapse
www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7qQWdUPKAo
——-
jet fuel could melt steal beams IF IT’S ON FIRE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp9_rORKzUg

Fails experiment because the bottom block suffered structural damage from dozens of paper plane impacts.
——————

SIMULATIONS

TOWERS:

Why Towers Did not Collapse (PROOF)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIv0IxpuCE
———-
WTC1 and WTC2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKxoC4_T-GA
———-
Debunking Novas Pancake Theory of WTC using common sense
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQh18kvpRU
———–
WTCCS Parameter Information
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1VUsEUUW2E
—————-

WTC 7 SIMULATIONS:

NIST WTC7 Collapse Simulation Versus Real-Time Demolition Comparison 1
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUQ0xnt1iBs
———
NIST WTC7 Global Collapse Simulation
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIAK6PAeyn8
———-
9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXxynEDpwrA
——————-

INTERESTING:

World Trade Center a 3D Visualization – WTC
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HOTAUy_mrQ
———
Collapse
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsXDmDOmF30
——-
Collapse Simulation (Ball)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsXDmDOmF30
——–
Over 5000 KEVA planks building – Bullet Physics
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9HaT23b-xc
—————-

GRAVITY EXAMPLES

9/11 Truth For Dummies: How to become a 9/11 Truther in just a few minutes!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9NG0TI-Gxw
———
Please explain how gravity and fire can hurl heavy STEEL columns laterally 100’s of feet away from the tower?!?!
www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/docs/site1085c.jpg

———
The spreading and ejecting of tons of material over a 1200′ diameter does not imply a gravity and fire collapse. The debris field was 6 times the size of the towers footprint.
www.911review.com/attack/wtc/imgs/fig_1_7.jpg

The only way HEAVY STEEL COLUMNS can get from Point A and land at Point B 100’s of feet away is from a force MUCH greater than Gravity and Fire.

There are only a couple things in this world that can hurl objects 100’s of feet laterally away from its original spot at immense speed….. Gravity is not one of those things.

Show me one example of a steel framed high rise building that has virtually collapsed from fire or structural damage? I’ll wait.
————-
The Windsor Tower in Madrid Spain
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4MjsVnasLA

This is a perfect example of Newton’s laws at work.

Watch after 1:15. You will see the building structure fail and it partially collapses. The core still stands. The collapsing debris does not fall straight through the entire building. It peels away from the building falling through the path of LEAST resistance….. AIR. It also doesn’t explode causing steel columns to fly 100’s of feet through the air like we saw with the towers. Also the Madrid Building burned for 20+ hours and did not totally collapse. The towers burned for 58 mins and 1 hr 20 mins respectively.
————

RUSSIAN DEMO FAIL

On December 26th, 2014, a 16 story building was to be demolished with explosives but something went wrong and this is what happened.

‘10.0 quake-resistant!’: Demolishers desperate, high-riser intact after 2 blasts (VIDEO)
http://rt.com/news/218051-crimea-demolition-building-fail/

Video Footage
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1McSQSqfeIY
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTGArfyXV80 (Full)

Not even a second blast could bring it down totally.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhFZHWLKE4E

The third blast only managed to tip it over.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd2IHbsNw0k

Explain 9/11 Physics to me again!?!?!?!
—————–

VERINAGE TECHINQUE

Demolition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition

“The technique of Vérinage is used in France to weaken and buckle the supports of central floors promoting the collapse of the top part of a building onto the bottom resulting in a rapid, symmetrical, collapse.”
—————
What a Gravity Driven Demolition Looks Like
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYUGFG3Rj0

Démolition Balzac Vitry
www.youtube.com/watch?v=syzKBBB_THE&

This is another example of a large building demolished without explosives, using the hydraulic ‘verinage’ technique.
Note the collapse floors are weakened, but not the rest of the structure.

Note: This building is approx 15-16 stories tall and it takes approx. 5 seconds to collapse. The towers were 110 stories and fell in 10 and 12 seconds respectively. WTC 7 was 47 stories and it fell in 6.5 seconds. Proving this building (Balzac) did not fall at the acceleration of gravity aka Free fall.
—————
Vérinage Compilation – Explosiveless Demolition
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFHEoiUZ7o

None of these collapses come close to collapsing at free fall acceleration. Why? Because of resistance of the bottom floors (even though in some cases the bottom floors have been weakened prior)
—————-
Verinage style demolitions use hydraulics to push out lower structural supports in order for the upper floors to crush the lower often weakened floors prior. It does not collapse at anywhere near free fall due to the resistance of the lower floors. Let’s look at some more characteristics of a demolition using the Verinage Technique.

The Verinage Technique Characteristics:

1) Lower floors are often pre weakened beforehand.
2) Hydraulic presses are used to remove all vertical structural supports at the same time.
3) Collapse does not happen anywhere close to free fall.
4) No Pyroclastic cloud.
5) Building components aren’t flown through the air laterally.
6) The building falls into its own footprint leaving huge chunks of debris and concrete. Not dust.
7) This technique does not work on Steel framed buildings. It only works on buildings with load bearing walls, not steel columns.

Debunkers forget to mention any of these characteristics when explaining the Verinage technique.

The Verinage technique only helps validate that what happened on 9/11 was physically impossible without the aid of explosives.
—————-

———————

THERMITE EXPERIMENTS

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

———-
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw

———-
Kevin Ryan: Experiments with nanothermite
www.youtube.com/watch?v=O66UyGNrmSI

———-
Linear Thermite Cutting Charges
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn-MCCZ3O1M

———-
Mark Basile ignites a chip (nano-thermite) – 9/11
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1TwVACENAo

———
Incendiary Experiments
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXlC2TlNgEU
————–

NIST’S EXPERIMENTS

NIST EXPERIMENTS
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/nist/nist-experiments/
——–
NIST WTC SIMULATIONS
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/nist/debunking-nist/nist-wtc-simulations/
——–
THE MANY THEORIES FROM NIST
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/nist/the-many-theories-from-nist/
——————–