RK OWENS

RK OWENS

RKOwens4 is a 9/11 debunker on Youtube that makes short videos with funky music in order to make fun of 9/11 Truthers. His arguments really hold no ground but here is an entire list of videos that he has made.

Call RKowens whatever you want. A debunker, shill, Govt agent, or just a fraud. He is working from the inside. If you notice, he has disabled all his videos from comments.

I can challenge every debunking attempt in each of the videos. Fairly easily.
————–
RKOwens4
www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4

9/11 Truth Movement: R.I.P. (Part 1 of 3)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-iE-hrdgZg&

“There are well over 100 conspiracy theories in the “9/11 Truth Movement”. Exactly zero percent of them are true. Each relies entirely on its believers not checking its facts, because with even the smallest amount of research they quickly fall apart. The goal of the “9/11 Debunked” series of videos is to reveal the blatant lies behind these theories, one at a time, in order to save the historical accuracy of 9/11.”
—————
9/11 Debunked: NORAD “Stand Down” Disproven
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q
———–
9/11 Debunked: BBC Early Report on WTC 7 Collapse Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8
———–
9/11 Debunked: Larry Silverstein’s “Pull It” Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC 7’s Collapse Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC7 “Radio Countdown” Disproven
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lhwCM_dicc
———–
9/11 Debunked: Why 9/11 Commission Didn’t Investigate WTC7
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjcAoc3ZPwY
———–
9/11 Debunked: Bush Brother Never in Charge of WTC Security
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh8hErn2UZU
———–
9/11 Debunked: Pentagon Flight 77 Photo Evidence
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk
———–
9/11 Debunked: Pentagon Flight 77 Video Evidence
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4
———–
9/11 Debunked: Pentagon damage NOT inconsistent with 757
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8B-AvIt6V4
———–
9/11 Debunked: Real Reason for Pentagon Lawn Gravel
www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7iX_jHg_Uo
———–
9/11 Debunked: Mysterious Blue Box Uncovered
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtyzsSL3Gaw&
———–
9/11 Debunked: Firefighters in the Impact Zone
www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1g3OAOiOP0
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – No Small or Oxygen-Starved Fires
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAd_9zeldkI
———–
9/11 Debunked: “Molten Metal” Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhHzMttUKO0
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – No Pools of Molten Steel
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YXzjAKJQOg
———–
9/11 Debunked: 136 Eyewitnesses to Pentagon Attack
www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0
———–
9/11 Debunked: Thermate Chemical Signatures Disproven
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_1WP8do
———–
9/11 Debunked: Columns Cut not by Thermite
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0
———–
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center – No Free-Fall Speed
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4
———–
9/11 Debunked: Flight 77’s Pilot not a Terrorist
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tp8T2s96pg
———–
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center “Plane Missiles” Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0
———–
9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k
———–
9/11 Debunked: United 93 did not land in Cleveland
www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVbw4tbq7jM
———–
9/11 Debunked: 95% of United 93 found
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkivdEGph9A
———–
9/11 Debunked: The “First Time in History” Claim
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC Lobby & Basement Explosions Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRCTkSJOViY
———–
9/11 Debunked: On WTC’s Design to Withstand 707 Impact
www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3uq9zFT6xA
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – No Small or Oxygen-Starved Fires
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAd_9zeldkI
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC Accounts of Bombs & Explosions Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDXB6cifo
———–
9/11 Debunked: World Trade Center “Topple-Over” Scenario
www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9Mhhvl7vWk
———–
9/11 Debunked: Cell Phone Calls not Faked
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z96MZOZyilo
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – John Schroeder & Secondary Explosions
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJpsxQ3UI30

9/11 Debunked: WTC Accounts of Bombs & Explosions Explained
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDXB6cifo
———–
9/11 Debunked: United 93 not Shot Down
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgjWU6jXrdc
———–
9/11 Debunked: True Meaning of “A New Pearl Harbor”
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XebFE_7N-Dk
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC “Base Smoke” Identified
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTXFnAIP6A0
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – No Suspicious Insurance Policy
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDXNDZDATLg
———–
9/11 Debunked: WTC – Zero Hallmarks of Controlled Demolition
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsUYhrXonXQ
———–
9/11 Debunked: No Drop in WTC security pre-9/11
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IergOYj63oE
———–
9/11 Debunked: Real Reason for MASCAL Exercises
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFW_T2QfjgY
———–
9/11 Debunked: Norman Mineta – No Stand Down Order
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwFGLIsIBuM
———–
9/11 Debunked: Dick Cheney Never In Charge of NORAD
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhC3ElWQkEc
———————–

REFUTING RKOWENS

An Open Letter To Ryan Owens
http://911debunkers.blogspot.ca/2010/09/open-letter-to-ryan-owens.html

“Let me start off by saying that the purpose of this message is not meant in any way to insult you as a researcher or as a person in general. The purpose of this message is meant to simply inform you of errors that you have made in your 9/11 research, and my sincere hope that you will correct such errors. This is not meant to be an argument of any kind, but merely one researcher offering advise to another researcher.

That being said, the reason for this message is largely due to a post you made on your Youtube channel, in which you claimed that if any 9/11 truther could point out anything you got wrong in any of your videos, you would either remove the video or fix the mistake.”
—-
A Response from Ryan Owens
http://911debunkers.blogspot.ca/2010/10/response-from-ryan-owens.html

“Sorry I’ve been away for a while everyone. My computer’s been broken for about three weeks. But it’s fixed now and I’m back to doing what I do best: Debunk the debunkers.

A few months back I sent my open letter to debunker Ryan Owens. Within a few weeks he responded back. Here’s his full response with my comments added. Ryan has given me full permission to use this email in any way I want.

(My comments in red, and also links.)”
——–