DuckDuckGo Building 7
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH (AE911)
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is an American non-profit organization of architects, engineers, and demolition experts who dispute the results of official investigations into the September 11 attacks, including the 9/11 Commission Report.
“2,300+ Architects and Engineers and 19,000+ other supporters have signed the petition demanding a truly independent WTC investigation. Open to everyone. We are all over the World.”
http://www.ae911truth.org/
—————
Like, Like, Like! 250,000+
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth
————–
“EXPERTS SPEAK OUT” TESTIMONIALS
9/11 EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE – EXPERTS SPEAK OUT
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/top-911-docs/911-explosive-evidence-experts-speak-out/
9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW6mJOqRDI4 (FULL)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg (1 HOUR)
—————–
BEYOND MISINFORMATION
“This 50-page primer provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence regarding the World Trade Center destruction and a careful examination of the hypotheses that researchers have put forward to explain what caused it.
With references to dozens of scholarly papers and videos, it is both a perfect starting point for those who are new to the subject and a valuable resource for those already immersed in it.”
http://www.beyondmisinformation.org/
———–
9/11 VIRTUAL ACTION KIT
http://911expertsspeakout.org/Intro_ak.html
———–
OTHER GREAT VIDEOS BY AE911 TRUTH
Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 (15 Minutes)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
—————
AE911Truth – Psychologists on coping with 9-11 truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ju5gV8wAbpM
————
This 10 Minute Video Will Change Your Life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55M1p48BhVc
————–
9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM
————
9/11 The Toronto Hearings – 2011/12 (Full Length)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiVv8tQdmY
————
FACT #3 (AE911TRUTH)
3) 2300+ Engineers and Architects support a new independent 9/11 investigation. Richard Gage (Founder of AE911). Watch these great documentaries ‘Explosive Evidence’, ‘Blueprint for Truth’, ‘Toronto Hearings’. Research ae911truth.org and ReThink911.org. 200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials question the official story. Research Robert Bowman, Sibel Edmonds, Paul Craig Roberts, Mark Dayton, Cynthia McKinney. Google ‘9/11 Whistle blowers’ and ‘Patriots for 9/11′.
RICHARD GAGE
Richard Gage (AIA), a San Francisco Bay area based architect, founded Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in 2006. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, has worked as an architect for twenty years and was involved in the construction of numerous fireproof steel-frame buildings.
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
Lic: C19220
B. Arch.
Berkeley, CA
“Once you get to the science, it‟s indisputable.”
–Richard Gage, AIA
———–
RICHARD GAGE
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-truth-info/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth/richard-gage
———-
RG ON CSPAN
MediaOne Services – Richard Gage: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zY9HfwzGPg
CSPAN Direct Link (264,212 VIEWS)
http://www.c-span.org/video/?320748-5/washington-journal-architects-engineers-911-truth
————-
OTHER RICHARD GAGE
Richard Gage on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, CA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM&
———-
This 10 Minute Video Will Change Your Life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55M1p48BhVc
———-
Michael J. Heimbach, Assistant Director, Counterterrorism Division, FBI says in 2008:
“Mr. Gage presents an interesting theory, backed by thorough research and analysis.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11606178/911-FBI-Response-on-AE911-Research-Ongoing-Investigation
————
KEVIN RYAN
KEVIN RYAN
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-info/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth/kevin-ryan/
————
NIELS HARRIT
NIELS HARRIT
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-info/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth/niels-harrit/
————–
STEVEN JONES
Steven E. Jones, Prof. of Physics Emeritus, Senior Engineer
PhD, Physics, Vanderbilt University 1978
Spring City, UT
Steven Jones (Physicist) – “9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts speak out”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjeK4OU2CEc&
—————
15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses
http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/abs/2016/04/epn2016474p21/epn2016474p21.html
“15 years later: on the physics of high-rise building collapses
Steven Jones1, Robert Korol2, Anthony Szamboti3 and Ted Walter4
1 Brigham Young University (early retired)
2 McMaster University (emeritus)
3 Mechanical design engineer in the aerospace industry
4 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Abstract
On September 11, 2001, the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises. Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred.”
——–
9/11 : Dr. STEVEN JONES PRESENTATION- 911
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pL0M5ST8jY
————–
JONATHAN COLE
Jonathan H. Cole, P.E.
Lic: 36384 FL
B.S. Civil Engineering UConn
Englewood, FL
“Jonathan Cole is a Professional Engineer licensed in New Hampshire and Florida, with 28 years of experience. For more than 10 years he has been the head of a mid-sized engineering firm with some 25 employees. In addition to designing large-scale engineering projects, he has performed services as an expert witness in his field. He volunteers his services for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, in his capacity as a board director. Recently, his experiments related to the thermite theory of destruction for the WTC have become very influential among independent investigators.”
———-
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
———-
9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ySUrEiVFIM
———-
9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s&;
———-
9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww8hBFNY8jk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgZLXI3whGA
——–
9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w
——-
NEWTON’S LAWS VS. NIST – 9/11 EXPERIMENTS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5oQ2mTwa9s
——–
9/11: The Devil’s in the details
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTANZaYPCkw
———
9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNzaMRsN00
———-
DAVID CHANDLER
———–
WTC NORTH TOWER EXPLODING, David Chandler, AE911truth.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc
———–
Freefall Acceleration of WTC7 (David Chandler)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POUSJm–tgw
————
Clocking WTC7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP4_8s-2Gmc
————-
9/11: Best Physical Evidence for Explosives (revised)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-KosTYUs4I
————
9 /11: Hard Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL1kkgXOV6c
————-
High Speed Massive Projectiles from the WTC by David Chandler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peGNOAX646Q
———–
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkp-4sm5Ypc
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw
————
David Chandler 911 NIST WTC7 Explosions heard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6mw2-k62_I
———–
David Chandler YT Channel
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxvGFyCUkbMk4pB0C-AUJwQ
————
AE911TRUTH NEWS
Police Chiefs Across the US Alerted About 9/11 WTC Demolition Evidence
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/699-police-chiefs-across-the-us-alerted-about-911-wtc-demolition-evidence.html
“On January 16 we sent a personalized fax to every police chief and sheriff in the United States, outlining some of the key WTC controlled demolition evidence and directing them to AE911Truth.org/Police-2013, a focused portion of our website that includes additional, more detailed evidence for law enforcement professionals. Our fax requests that its recipients forward the information through their proper channels and also contact our organization to offer their professional advice on how we might pursue this criminal matter. ”
———
AE911Truth Reaches Out to Labor Unions
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/712-ae911truth-reaches-out-to-labor-unions.html
————-
“For instance, as of September 2013, out of the 137 signatories with a first name starting with A, only 21 had their background listed as civil or structural engineering.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architects_%26_Engineers_for_9/11_Truth
————-
FAQ #6: Why does AE911Truth Represent Only a Small Percentage of Architects and Engineers?
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/586-faq-9.html
===================
WTC 7 EVALUATION (ALASKA)
WTC 7 EVALUATION
http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-VNjYXU-CE
“WTC 7 Evaluation is a study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks using finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse.”
—–
Attorneys Are Told: “Possibility of WTC 7 Collapsing Due to Fire is ZERO”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxG4lYyitsI&
“After his presentation, when asked by Public Interest Attorney Daniel Sheehan, “On a scale of 1 to 100, what is the possibility that WTC 7 could have collapsed simply because of fires?” Dr. Hulsey replied “Zero”. He also said that if any of his Ph.D. students had submitted the explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 that NIST gave us, he would have failed them.”
ZERO POSSIBILITY!
—————
*SIGN THE PETITION*
“Please Take Notice That:
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 – specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe there is sufficient doubt about the official story to justify re-opening the 9/11 investigation. The new investigation must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned”
http://www2.ae911truth.org/signnow.php
SIGN THE PETITION AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT!
===========================
RETHINK911
ReThink911.org | Sign the Petition for a new 9/11 investigation
http://rethink911.org/
https://www.facebook.com/Rethink911
———-
Reality Check: More Americans “Rethinking” 9/11?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7tSfwkKaUo
——–
The Official ReThink911 Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNR6Kbg5jJ8
——-
TIME to Re-Think 9/11 & WTC 7!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CLfkJOYLIU
———
Sept. 11 ‘Truthers’ Mark Anniversary
http://nation.time.com/2013/09/11/sept-11-truthers-mark-anniversary/
———
ReThink911 September 2014 Times Square Billboard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhllqmXxyXM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuesL-ufkzo
————–
Cynthia Mckinney on 9/11, and the reason America is in the Middle East
http://www.youtu.be/cd6OpoW6siA
———–
Distinguised U.S Marine Stands Up for American People and 9/11 Truth
http://www.youtu.be/weIjYscff5k
———-
THIRD BLUE BEAM
The Story Behind the Story: The AE911Truth Third Beam Team
http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/385-the-story-behind-the-story-the-ae911truth-third-beam-team.html
“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder, Richard Gage, AIA, started the jubilant e-mail to AE911Truth members and supporters after the historic two-billion-candlepower Third Beam burst into the NYC skyline at 9:11 p.m. on Sept. 11: “The Third Beam went on without a hitch! … It was awesome, Team!””
————
CANADIAN PETITION
Landmark Petition Submitted to Parliament Could Launch Canadian 9/11 Investigation
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/932-rethink911-canada-holds-parliamentary-press-conference.html
“A historic milestone in the 9/11 Truth Movement has been achieved by a dedicated group of activists in Ottawa, Ontario, with the presentation of a petition in the House of Commons requesting a “parliamentary review of the omissions and inconsistencies in the official United States of America 9/11 Commission Report.”
———–
Elizabeth May presents ‘9/11 truther’ petition to Parliament
http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/elizabeth-may-presents-9-11-truther-petition-to-parliament-1.2133362
“Green Party Leader Elizabeth May put forward a bizarre petition in the House of Commons Wednesday asking the government to support a popular 9/11 conspiracy theory.
Petition from 9/11 Families Presented to Canadian Parliament
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX2dWCN1zhc
————-
Rethink911.ca 9/11 Petition Full Press Conference
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNZboI5Fovo
————
New Democrat MP faces criticism over 9/11 conspiracy lecture
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/03/27/new_democrat_mp_faces_criticism_over_911_conspiracy_lecture.html
“Halifax MP Megan Leslie’s website includes event listing for presentation by Richard Gage, founder of group devoted to “truth” about World Trade Center attacks.”
————
———
Press Release: Harper Government Relies on Torture Evidence, Say Three Professional Organizations
http://rethink911.ca/press-release-harper-government-relies-on-torture-evidence-say-three-professional-organizations/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/canada-harper-government-relies-on-torture-evidence-say-three-professional-organizations/5429750?
“In his brief response to the petitioners, Mr. Blaney stated:
“The Government will not tolerate the waste of taxpayer dollars by studying conspiracy theories.”
——–
The Canadian Government does not care about 9/11 Truth. The Government of Canada is controlled like all the rest of them by the powers that be. Harper is a sell out puppet to Canadians and a traitor to this great country.
—————
QUOTES FROM PROFESSIONALS
Bob Bowman, Ph.D., Lt. Col. USAF Ret. “When I saw the Twin towers fall down I knew this could not happen, those airplanes and those fires could not cause the buildings to come down the way they did.”
———-
Kathy McGrade, B.S., Materials Engineering
“In an office fire, you cannot generate enough heat to melt steel.”
———-
Steven Jones, Ph,D., Physicist, Former Brigham Young Univ. Professor
“Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings. What is this molten metal? Direct evidence of the use of thermite.”
———-
Jeffrey Farrer,Ph.D., Materials Science Engineer / M.S. Physics
“Our conclusions were that the red/gray chips were some form of thermite or nano thermite. The finding of aluminum in the steel samples also supports the theory that thermite was used to melt the steel.”
———-
Roland Angle, P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer
“What really concerns me is we’re beginning to live in a society that is rebellious against science. It’s important that all of us with the technical expertise speak out on the 9/11 issue.”
———-
Niels Harrit, Ph.D., Chemistry
“A new investigation is needed that includes looking for remaining explosives and thermitic materials in the WTC dust.”
———-
Joel Miller, Architect
“It appears to me that there’s compelling evidence that all three of the world trade center buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. There is not only video evidence, but there is physical evidence as well.”
———-
Anthony Szamboti, B.S.M.E., Mechanical Engineer
“The tons of molten metal under just the three WTC buildings that collapsed made me realize that what we’re being told about how they collapsed is false.”
———-
Ed Munyak, P.E., 25-Year Fire Protection and Mechanical Engineer
“Even one global collapse would have been extraordinary, but to have 3 occur in one day was just beyond comprehension.”
———-
Mark Basile, B.S.Ch.E., 25 Years in Materials Analysis
“I’ve independently seen thermitic activity within 2 separate independent samples of world trade center dust. All of the characteristics of the micro-spheres tell me that thermite was used in melting those steel beams.”
———-
David Gregg, Ph.D., Chemical Engineer 30 years at Livermore Laboratories
“The only way that’s known that a carbonaceous material can cause steel, or iron oxide to turn into a molten metal is in a blast furnace. And that’s very different than what we had.”
———-
Alfred Lopez, S.E. Structural Engineer
“In Building 7, we have a total collapse against 40,000 tons of structural steel at free-fall acceleration, and that doesn’t make sense.”
———-
Pedro Buccellato, High-Rise Architect
“I believe that all the evidence made available by AE911Truth proves beyond any doubt that explosives were used to bring down the towers as many people concluded from the outset, simply from visual evidence and knowledge of basic physics.”
———-
Lynn Margulis, Ph.D, Professor, University of MA
“The WTC buildings came down because they were very carefully controlled demolitions with high-explosives that had to be planted many weeks, if not months, in advance.”
———-
Jody Gibbs, 35-Year Architect
“The Twin Towers fell at a speed which can only occur if the vertical structure has been removed.”
———-
William Rice,P.E., Civil/Structural Engineer
“Watching Building 7 collapse in under 7 seconds, after watching the Twin Towers collapse, I think most anyone would recognize these as controlled demolitions.”
———-
Jason Cheshire, B.S.Ch.E., Chemical Engineer/Metallurgist
“1400º hot spots at the WTC for over a week indicates that there was something very hot going on below the surface.”
———-
Adam Parrott, B..S.Ch.E., Chemical Engineering
“When the USGS collected samples of the World Trade Center dust, they found the presence of these microspheres of iron in all of the samples. The USGS does not have a valid explanation for the presence of these iron microspheres.”
———-
David Topete, S.E. Structural Engineer
“For World Trade Center 7 to collapse straight down upon itself as the video indicates, as everything that we’ve witnessed, the supports at the center essentially all had to be taken out at once.”
———-
Kevin Ryan,B.S. Chemistry, Former Mgr. Underwriters Laboratories
“Thermite -if it was present at the World Trade Center, and created this molten metal that so many witnesses and photographic evidence shows would also explain potentially the fact that fires could not be put out at Ground Zero.”
———-
Frank Cullinan, P.E., Civil Engineer
“It was shocking how fast the buildings collapsed. Tens of thousands of structural connections had to fail not only nearly simultaneously, but in sequential order.”
———-
Rick Fowlkes,P.E., 40-Year Civil/Structural Engineer
“On Sept. 11 when I saw the Twin Towers coming down, I knew that it had to be controlled demolitions we were witnessing.”
———-
Robert Kim Ireland, B.S.Ch.E., Chemical Engineer
“3 buildings collapsed on 9/11 but there were only 2 planes, that means the third building, WTC 7, had to collapse for some other reason.”
———-
Kevin Kelly, FAIA, Architect
“The presentation made by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at the AIA Convention in San Francisco made a sufficient case that a new investigation into the destruction of the 3 skyscrapers on 9/11/01 would be worthwhile.”
———-
Erik Lawyer, Firefighter, Founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
“There were all kinds of firefighters and civilians that were reporting explosions. Just the fact that there were explosions means they need to be investigated.”
———–
Richard Humenn, Chief Electrical Design Engineer, for construction of the Twin Towers
“Knowing the strength of the structures, it was unbelievable to me that plane impacts and fuel burning would be the only reason for the Twin Towers to collapse. The only way they could have collapsed was if the core columns were compromised.”
———-
David A Johnson – Internationally known architect
“(A)s a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their design…So I was well aware of the strenth of the core with its steel columns …When i saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not come down the way they did without explosives and severing of core columns at the base…Morever the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A building failing from, assymetrical structural failure would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly…The official explanation doesn’t hold water.” Pg. 37 “9/11 Ten Years Later”, Dr David Ray Griffin
———
Dr David Ray Griffin – Theologian
“Do we not here have a clear illustration of the fact that all too often, Christian faith is less important to Christians in America than their American faith? The evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, I have argued, is overwhelming with anyone with eyes to see, and Christian faith at its best serves to open people’s eyes to this evidence. When Christian faith is subordinated to faith in American goodness, however, it becomes a blinding faith, producing Chritsians with eyes wide shut.” Pg,. 216, Dr David Griffin, “9/11 Ten Years Later”
———-
Jonathan H. Cole, P.E. (Engineer)
“Not one fire-only collapse theory put forth to-date can be supported by the scientific method. The crush-down crush-up pile driver theory is wrong because it defies Newton’s third law, doesn’t match observation and had not been supported by any known experiment. The “pancake” theory is wrong because it defies momentum laws, cannot explain the fall of the core, doesn’t match observation, and cannot be replicated experimentally.” “The Official Collapse Narrative and The Experimental Method” Chapter 11
——-
Tom Sullivan, Explosives Loader (CDI)
“I knew from day 1 that this was a controlled event.”
——–
Jody Gibbs – 35-Year Architect
“The Twin Towers fell at a speed which can only occur if the vertical structure has been removed.”
———
Dan Barnum – FAIA, High-Rise Architect
“The tops of the buildings were basically disintegrated.”
———
Anthony Szamboti – B.S.M.E., Mechanical Engineer
“The tons of molten metal under just the three WTC buildings that collapsed made me realize that what we’re being told about how they collapsed is false.”
———
Steven Dusterwald – 37-Year S.E. Structural Engineer
“What caught my attention was the rapid failure of connections that had to happen in order for Building 7 to come down at the rate that it did.”
———-
Robert Podolsky – M.S., Physicist/Engineer
“All 3 WTC buildings fell way faster than they would have had there been any resistance from the lower part of the building.”
———
David Gregg – Ph.D., Chemical Engineer 30 years at Livermore Laboratories
“The only way that’s known that a carbonaceous material can cause steel, or iron oxide to turn into a molten metal is in a blast furnace. And that’s very different than what we had.”
———
Michael Donly – P.E. 14-year Structural Engineer
“There’s not enough time for the building to collapse in the way NIST tells us it collapsed.”
“What we see is an outward explosion of material, beyond the parameters of each footprint. This is not expected, and it’s not congruent with the reports of our government.” – M. Donly, P.E., Structural Engineer (14 years in the profession)
———-
Mike Collins, M.S.M.E, Mechanical Engineer
“NIST reported suspicious amounts of corrosion and high-temperature attacks to the recovered steel, yet did not even attempt to test for explosives. Not only does this go against common protocol, but also common sense.”
———
David A Johnson B.Arch, MCP (City Planning), PhD (Regional Planning), F.AICP
“As a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their design …So I was well aware of the strength of the core with its steel columns …When i saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not come down the way they did without explosives and the severing of core columns at the base….Moreover the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A building failing from asymmetrical structural failures would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly…The official explanation doesn’t hold water.” David A Johnson, “Internationally known architect .” pg. 37
———-
NOTE: You can easily find more quotes from these professionals from their Bio’s on the AE petition.
http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html
————
BBC CASE
Historic Case to Challenge BBC’s 9/11 Coverage
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/711-historic-case-to-challenge-bbcs-911-coverage.html
“On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.”
Tony Rooke put together a team of 9/11 researchers to present evidence in this case. Those experts include: Niels Harrit, Tony Farrell, Ian Henshall, Ray Savage, Peter Drew and other supporters.
——–
Small But Significant Triumph for 9/11 Truth Activist in UK Court
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/57-news-releases-by-others/715-small-but-significant-triumph-for-911-truth-activist-in-uk-court.html
“In an act of civil disobedience, Tony Rooke refused to pay a £130 TV license fee, alleging that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks. Facing a judge Monday, Rooke was not convicted and did not have to pay the fine.”
———–
Tony Rooke at the Magistrates’ Court – BBC TV license
http://www.youtube.com/watch?t=133&v=bHQPaAkIl0I
———–
Tony Farrell @ Horsham BBC Trials Feb 25 2013
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov_8GCv7wl0
——
TV licence evader refused to pay because the ‘BBC covered up facts about 9/11 and claimed tower fell 20 minutes before it did’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html
——-
NOTES:
Charged with not paying his TV licence, Tony Rooke had claimed at Horsham Magistrates’ Court that the BBC’s treatment of the 9/11 attacks made it complicit in acts of terrorism.
He asked to submit evidence which he said would show that the BBC had consistently failed to report the true story.
District Judge Stephen Nicholls said that, even if he accepted and agreed with the evidence, that would not give him grounds to rule that Rooke was not guilty.
He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs.
Outside court, Rooke said the case had been a ‘score draw’ since the judge had looked at the evidence – albeit in private – and had decided not to fine him.
————-
CONSENSUS 9/11
“The 23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel is building a body of evidence-based research into the events of September 11, 2001. This evidence — derived from a standard scientific reviewing process — is available to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution. The Panel regularly features selected excerpts from its Consensus Points, with links to full supporting documentation. These featured excerpts are shown below, along with other recent News items.”
http://www.consensus911.org/
http://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/
—————–
AIA RESOLUTION
AIA RESOLUTION 15-6 (7 WORLD TRADE CENTER)
http://wtc7resolution.org/
Resolution 15-6 DID NOT PASS. 160 voted yes, 3,892 voted no and 96 Abstained from the vote.
AIA chose politics over their professional education and experience.
“We are a professional – not a political – organization. But in this case, if we vote “no” on this resolution, we are making a political decision, not a professional one. Thank you very much.” – Daniel Barnum, FAIA
The American Institute of Architects fails 9/11 victims and common sense
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK2cljjI44g
———-
2015 – AIA / Atlanta GA – Resolution 15-6 — Raw Cell Phone Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH1268AXhmE&
“Madam President, the Board does not support this resolution. This resolution would effectively put the institute on record as questioning the validity of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s investigation and the report of the collapse the 7th World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001.”
———–
2016 – 11% of AIA Delegates Vote ‘Yes’ on
Supporting New WTC 7 Investigation
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=5b1f29d3c9&e=%5BUNIQID%5D
“Resolution 16-3, which was sponsored by 97 AIA members affiliated with AE911Truth, garnered 11% of the delegates’ votes, losing 529 to 4,176. The 11% tally represents nearly a threefold increase over the 4% won last year.”
————-
NIST LAWSUIT
NIST Lawsuit Underway
http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=2625884318
———–
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Upcoming Lawsuit to End Stonewalling by FEMA and NIST
http://www.globalresearch.ca/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth-upcoming-lawsuit-to-end-stonewalling-by-fema-and-nist/5409241
———–
AE 9/11 Truth researchers plan lawsuit to seek release of 500,000 documents held by FEMA, NIST
http://wtfrly.com/2014/11/01/ae-911-truth-researchers-plan-lawsuit-seek-release-of-500000-documents-held-by-fema-nist/
—————
AE911 TRUTH MEMES
