MISINFO: Impossible speeds of aircrafts

MISINFO: IMPOSSIBLE SPEEDS at 1000′ altitude

Some Pilots claim that it is impossible to fly a Commercial Boeing 757/767 500mph at 1000 feet in Altitude.
—————–
9/11: Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/wtc_speed

“Pilots For 9/11 Truth have calculated the Equivalent Airspeed for EA990 peak speed of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet as the equivalent dynamic effects of 425 knots (489 mph) at or near sea level. This airspeed is 65 knots (75 mph) over max operating for a 767, 85 knots (98 mph) less than the alleged United 175, and 5 knots (6 mph) less than the alleged American 11. Although it may be probable for the alleged American 11 to achieve such speed as 430 knots (495 mph) is only 5 knots (6 mph) over that of EA990 peak speed, It is impossible for the alleged United 175 to achieve the speeds reported by the NTSB using EA990 as a benchmark.”
————-

JOHN LEAR

JOHN LEAR (Impossible Speeds debunked)
https://kendoc911.wordpress.com/911-disinfo-trolls/john-lear/

John Lear – Vanishing Planes & Holographs
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CudLxM04l6A
—————

IMPOSSIBLE SPEED COMPARISONS

Let me show you some examples of passenger planes flying at very high speeds very low off the ground and then tell me it’s not possible.

Top British pilot fired for performing 320mph ‘fly-by’ just 28 feet from the ground – in a jumbo full of VIPs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-518448/Top-British-pilot-fired-performing-320mph-fly-just-28-feet-ground–jumbo-VIPs.html

Here are video’s to this Flyover!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1ijLu2HzvI&
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-Nm7sgK9zI&
—————
The Claim is that this plane was travelling at 700 kmh / 435 mph.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nBaU0vwP-o

TAP Airbus A310 Low Pass Turn – Portugal Airshow 2007, Evora (Uncut HD Version)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=26H-WzIe858

Airbus A310 TAP Portugal Air Show 2007 – Rapada nº4 / Low Pass 4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-tVBCX8yDQ

Airbus A310 TAP Portugal Air Show 2007 – Rapada nº3 / Low Pass 3
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkJr2kY1TqY
—————-
RNZAF Boeing 757 Fast Flyby
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnYI2BQ9n9k
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcLcbkF-hc

—————-
Boeing 757 – High Speed Low Pass! All Out.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uiv6UvYnf3s
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy1IPWQZqkM

——————
KC 135 Low Pass
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kruy-Ici-J8
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHtdqy9trEI

—————
Aviation
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrSrMSkW4so

—————-
Video Plane crash Aerosucre Boeing 727 cargo Colombia Accidente aéreo avion 21 12 2016
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOyPsZUCr0s
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyq2LSRHNOU

Tuesday 20 December 2016
https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20161220-0

———

More Low passes at high speeds!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkXDagQv0Ho (737-200)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRMtUh5PjCk (B727 390 knots/430 mph)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2E6EExjyQ4 (757)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hBTYEMkEV4 (747)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=08G4z63PShc (747)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTMC_EcrAz0 (DC 10)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxYYcuw0-NQ (777 AA)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZ36dhkpDOY (AA Landing)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tome2lTcQE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDz6sEdrcfM (A319 Takeoff)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTP0KovPBvY
—————-
B-1B Lancer 500mph Flyby!!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=13JGsr95wFo
The second pass “the wings are fully back…..over 500 miles per hour”

Here is what 500 mph looks like.

F4 Phantom Vs. Wall
www.youtube.com/watch?v=–_RGM4Abv8

Here is what 700 mph looks like

700 MPH @ 100 feet – Blue Angels Sneak Pass
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa9t_m-38Z4
—————-
CLAIM: A 767 cannot fly at 500 mph at low altitude!

5 No-planer Claims Refuted
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW1cs_QDeP8&t=5m28s
—————
Debunked: Pilots for 9/11 truth WTC speeds
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-pilots-for-9-11-truth-wtc-speeds.2942/
————–
GAC Speed Converter
NOTE: Mach speeds change with altitude, sea level is 762 mph, at altitude
is 660 mph. 40,000 feet is the usual altitude. Please enter numbers only.

http://www.globalaircraft.org/converter.htm
————-

OTHER FLY BY PLANES IN NEW YORK

Air Force One Flyby Of Goldman Sachs Tower
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn0tMMYEkQU

Low airplane escorted by jet over lower NYC – 4/27/09
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H_8kQoVVFg

Airforce one flying low with two F16s, what’s going on ????
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9afTbrPkd8
——–
Planes flying real close to new world trade center
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb9jsplWXf8
——–

AIRPLANE SPEED STUDY

There were two studies done on the speeds of the two air crafts that hit the Towers. The speed nor the aircraft played a role in the collapse of the Towers but the study said that the speed “exceeded emergency drive” and was in “danger of breaking up.”

Speed Likely Factor In WTC Collapse
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/speed-likely-factor-in-wtc-collapse-25-02-2002/

“The second plane was flying so fast that it was in danger of breaking up in the air as it approached the south tower, Boeing spokeswoman Liz Verdier told the Times.

“These guys exceeded even the emergency dive speed,” Verdier said. “It’s off the chart.”

Two studies have analyzed the speed of the planes, one by the Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the National Transportation Safety Board and the other by Eduardo Kausel, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”

“The government’s calculations put the speed of the first plane at 494 mph, and the second at 586 mph. The MIT analysis determined the first plane was traveling 429 mph, and the second 537 mph, The Times said.

The south tower collapsed 56 minutes after the crash. The north tower stood for 102 minutes.

Structural engineers have not determined to what extent the speed of the planes affected how long the buildings stood. They are studying many factors, including the point at which each tower was hit.”
————-

CONCLUSION

Misinformation. Maybe the impossible speeds aren’t as impossible as people believe. I wouldn’t advise travelling at those speeds and its not recommended due to safety standards but to say it’s impossible is not accurate.