MYLES POWER
MYLES POWER
Myles Power is a self proclaimed Part Time 9/11 debunker that likes to question/debate random people on the streets and not people in the scientific community. This is the debunking method used by Myles Power and anytime he is challenged on his “debunking”, he refuses to comment.
YT Account:
www.youtube.com/user/powerm1985?
facebook fanpage.
https://www.facebook.com/powerm1985
Website:
Myles Power (powerm1985)
————
Here is a set of 7 Videos created by Myles Power that “debunks” 9/11 Truth. Only problem is that he does not ask Scientists and Engineers these questions. Instead, he’d rather find random Truthers on the street who do not have all the necessary information to refute him.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 1 of 7 – Free fall and how the towers
collapsed
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmIjDfpTeMc
———-
I offered him a challenge that he refused to accept. Instead he likes to debate random people on the streets who don’t necessarily have all the info needed to refute this guy.
THE HARD FACTS ABOUT 9/11
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv6C6Tf4MGE
Debunk this!!!
www.facebook.com/powerm1985/posts/485680968140956
———–
Debate Challenge from Adam Taylor to Myles Power
www.facebook.com/powerm1985/posts/390986567664433
————
Group Threads about Myles Power:
Jeremy Rys
www.facebook.com/groups/2204686781/permalink/10152267244606782/
“Snowflake”
www.facebook.com/groups/2204686781/10153912849251782
—–
ADAM TAYLOR DEBUNKS MYLES POWER
Taylor Contra Power – Part 1: The Twin Towers
http://adamtaylor42.blogspot.ca/2012/12/taylor-contra-powers.html
“Science blogger Myles Power has recently uploaded a series of videos to YouTube documenting his interaction with several members of the 9/11 Truth Movement at Ground Zero for the 11-year anniversary.[1] He claims in these videos that he “debunks” several points made by the Movement. Here I will address his arguments and show why they fall well short of debunking the Movement’s case for the WTC being destroyed with controlled demolition.”
—-
Taylor Contra Power – Part 2: World Trade Center 7 (and other issues)
http://adamtaylor42.blogspot.ca/2013/03/taylor-contra-power-part-2-world-trade_9.html
“In Part 1 of my response to Myles Power’s YouTube video series, I examined his arguments regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers and the evidence for controlled demolition. Now I will focus on Mr. Power’s videos regarding the destruction of World Trade Center 7, and why the arguments presented in those videos utterly fail at debunking the Movement’s case for the building being demolished.
Building 7 Overview
After Mr. Power presents us with a number of rude and disrespectful comments he’s gotten from people on YouTube (he doesn’t think at this point to mention my lengthy critique of his first three videos), he gives an overview on why Building 7 supposedly collapsed. Essentially, he simply presents a rehashing of NIST’s assertions in their report on why the building collapsed.[1] But we shall see that neither NIST nor Mr. Power are correct in their assessments of the building’s collapse.”
———-
Speaking Truth to Power
http://adamtaylor42.blogspot.ca/2013/01/speaking-truth-to-power.html
“I’ve recently been involved in a series of debates with science blogger Myles Power over the events of 9/11. Though I’m currently working on Part 2 of my response to his YouTube video series, I need to address one issue that’s recently come to my attention. It seems that Mr. Power has decided to comment on our debate on his website, and he has some interesting things to say.”
———-
Debunking the Debunkers: Rebuttal to Myles Power – Molten Aluminum?
http://911debunkers.blogspot.nl/2013/01/rebuttal-to-myles-power-molten-aluminum.html
———-
OTHER
Myles Power refuses to debate any of the Architects and Engineers at AE911, yet he thinks fairly highly of the disinfo theories put forth by Dr. Judy Wood.
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” #3 – Conventional Controlled Demolition
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” #3 – Conventional Controlled Demolition
“The more I read, the more I found myself agreeing with Dr Wood’s conclusion on this subject.”
————
Leave a Reply